Swami Shibrupananda Jayrambati Ramkrishna Saradamath & Mission Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Ld. AO had taken two views in respect of same transaction/bank deposits made by the assessee, one pre-demonetization period deposits, which he treated as income from profession of the assessee and 50% of such deposits treated as income from profession. On the other hand, […]
Dilip B. Desai Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) From 01.04.2010 the business of the assessee was converted from sole proprietorship concern to newly incorporated partnership concern in the name of ‘D.B. Desai & Associates’ and PAN allotted to it is ‘AAHFD1697D’. Since the business was shifted to the partnership firm from 01.04.2010 all the relevant information […]
Held that mere extraordinary profit cannot be criteria for adjustment in the transfer price
Explore Gouri Shankar Jain case against CIT(A) regarding disallowance under Section 40A(3) for repairs. Detailed analysis, exceptions under Rule 6DD(k), and the tribunal decision.
Explore the legal intricacies of Anil Kumar Khetawat case vs. ACIT. Uncover how a jurisdictional flaw in issuing notice under section 143(2) renders the assessment proceedings void.
The assessee has received the share of profit as per the terms of the LLP agreement and, therefore, the same has rightly been held to be exempted u/s 10(2A) of the Act.
Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institution of Management Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT held that so far as organizing golf tournament is concerned, the said event cannot be said to be a part of the educational activity for which the Trust is established. Therefore, so far as golf tournament is concerned the said activity is not educational […]
Explore the impact of Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs CIT on Section 14A disallowance. ITAT Kolkata sets aside Ld. CIT(A) order, directing re-computation in light of strategic investments.
ITO Vs Laxmipat Surana (ITAT Kolkata) The revenue’s grievance is that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance made u/s. 43B of the Act for unpaid bank interest on secured loans of Rs. 3,55,54,116/-. We find that so far as amount of bank interest payable on the secured loans is concerned, there is no […]
Assessee did not appear on the date of hearing and did not furnish any application stating any reasonable cause for not appearing on the given date nor requested any adjournment. Thus, there is a clear violation of provision of Section 131 of the Act and penalty u/s 272A(1)(C) of the Act is attracted.
