Karb Associates Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Even if, the assessee does not make prayer to the A.O for referring the valuation to the DVO while disputing the valuation of the property made by the Stamp Duty Authority, then A.O being a quasi-judicial authority was duty bound to act fairly and suo-moto refer the […]
Sunny Rock Estates & Developers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Income earned during the year by the assessee is on inter-corporate deposit with Williamson Services Ltd. as interest income. We also note that assessee has consistently reported its earning of interest income from ICDs, as business income which has been accepted by the Department […]
ACIT Vs Pradip Mullick (ITAT Kolkata) Assessee submitted that owing to business of manufacturing and sale of sweets and confectioneries, he has to regularly purchase different types of raw materials from different vendors for his day to day business requirement. The number of vendors are large as there are small vendors mostly supplying perishable item […]
Assessee was not having any permanent establishment in India and was providing the service only from Singapore and therefore the provisions of Section 195 of the Act are not applicable.
Prity Tubes Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Coming to the next issue of sales promotion and advertisement expenses, we note that despite several queries and opportunities made available by the authorities below, the assessee has not been able to establish the nexus between the expenses incurred and the business of the assessee. Assessee has […]
Ashim Kumar Mahanta Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) The undisputed fact is that in this case Rs.27,68,700/- has been found deposited in the joint account of assessee as well as his wife in the savings bank account of Axis Bank. When confronted by the AO after reopening the assessment, according to the assessee, this amount was […]
Once assets have been put to use, claim of depreciation allowance on said assets cannot be restricted. ITAT allows claim of depreciation in respect of closed units or non-functional undertakings
Held that revisionary proceedings bad in law as initiated without conducting any enquiry or verification to establish that the assessment order is unsustainable
Held that payment towards management support services is allowable as business expenditure as the same is paid for smooth and effective running of the business.
ITAT not agreed with Conclusion that whatever income was shown in Form 26AS under assess’s PAN is his income
