ITAT Kolkata allows Govinda Debnath’s appeal for statistical purposes. Tribunal condoned the 126-day delay after finding the assessee received no CIT(A) hearing notices, remanding the case for fresh, merits-based adjudication.
ITAT Kolkata remands Lakshmi Ojha’s AY 2020-21 appeal to the AO. The Rs.1.76 crore addition for property value difference must be re-adjudicated after obtaining a mandatory valuation report from the DVO in the interest of justice.
The ITAT Kolkata has ruled that an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act cannot be made on share capital received from group companies when the assessee provides comprehensive documentary evidence, even if the directors of the investing companies do not appear in person.
ITAT Kolkata set aside a tax addition under Section 56(2)(x), ruling that the AO must offer a DVO valuation before relying solely on the property’s stamp duty value.
The ITAT ruled that a tax addition under Section 56(2)(x) cannot be made solely on stamp duty value. The AO must first obtain a DVO valuation.
ITAT Kolkata ruled a tax notice invalid for not specifying scrutiny type, quashing the entire assessment. The ruling reinforces that tax authorities must follow CBDT instructions.
The ITAT Kolkata deleted a ₹11.35 crore addition, holding that a retracted survey statement and “dumb documents” are insufficient to prove undisclosed income under Section 69A.
The ITAT Kolkata remits the DCIT Vs Seven Hills Project case back to the CIT(A) for re-examination, challenging the disallowance of unpaid service tax under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT reverses a tax addition on cash withdrawals, ruling that they were genuine business turnover and not unexplained income.
The ITAT dismisses a cooperative society’s appeal over disallowed tax deductions after the society confirmed it is pursuing an alternative remedy.
