ITAT Kolkata permits necessary corrections in TDS as the name of the assessee was absent in Form 26AS. Find full details of Vishal Pachisia Vs ITO case
Analysis of ITAT Kolkata’s ruling in Mahua Bagchi Vs ACIT. Emphasizes that Foreign Tax Credit can’t be denied for late filing of Form 67 under Sec 139(1).
ITAT Kolkata rules no disallowance on bonus outstanding paid before the due date of filing return, in the case of DCIT Vs Medica Hospitals Pvt Ltd. Details inside.
ITAT Kolkata held that reasons for reopening of the assessment recorded by an Authority who was not having territorial jurisdiction over the assessee is unsustainable in law and accordingly the entire reassessment proceeding is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Kolkata held that AO failed to examine the agreement as composite agreement and hence non-examination of AO with that angle has caused prejudice to the interest of Revenue and hence CIT rightly set aside the assessment order by exercising powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
Read analysis of ITAT judgment in Saraswati Gupta vs. ITO case confirming penalties under sections 271A and 271B for not maintaining and auditing books of account. Learn about the outcome and reasoning.
In Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs CIT case, ITAT Kolkata rules that concessional tax rate under section 115E is not applicable when money is deposited in Indian rupees, not foreign exchange.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition under section 68 towards unexplained cash credit unsustainable as assessee has discharged its onus to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribing company.
The assessee, M/s. K.K. Patel Finance Ltd has jurisdiction in Indore. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax passed assessment orders, indicating jurisdiction. The parties discussed appellate jurisdiction between the ITAT and the High Court based on the Assessing Officers location. The assessees counsel requested the appeals be transferred to the ITAT Indore Bench for adjudication.
ITAT Kolkata held that expenditure incurred towards interior decoration work of a rented office premises is allowable as revenue expenditure. Accordingly, disallowance of such expenditure unjustified.
