Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saraswati Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-2012
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Saraswati Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Confirms penalties under section 271A of Income Tax Act, 1961 for not maintaining books of account and Section 271B for not getting the books of account audited Recently the “A” Bench Of Kolkata Income Tax Appellate Tribunal passed a judgement in the above case confirming the penalties u/s 271A  for not maintaining books of account and 271B for not getting the books of account audited. The central point of discussion was whether both the penalties can be levied at the same time for the same AY or not, as we all have the assumption that if...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am a qualified Chartered Accountant with my experience in tax litigation matters both Income Tax , at an earlier age of 24 I have started representing before CIT(A) & ITAT and have been successful in providing relief to my clients , I have a vast knowledge regarding Futures & Options Trans View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mere Intention to Appeal Cannot Withhold Refunds: Section 54(11) Explained Madras HC Condones 285-Day Delay in GST Appeal for substantive justice No Physical Notice of Hearing by CIT(A), ITAT remanded matter back to CIT(A) for fresh Adjudication GSTR-1 can be amended even after the due date is crossed: Orissa High Court Sec 54 & 54F exemptions aren’t just for Property Owners: Here’s How you and your spouse/Legal Heirs can benefit View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

3 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031