ITAT Kolkata

Depreciation cannot be considered for computing section 14A disallowance

Sudha Apparels Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Depreciation claimed by assessee under section 32 cannot be considered for the purpose of computing disallowance under section 14A because section 14A deals only with the expenditure and not any statutory allowance, such as depreciation under section 32....

Read More

No Penalty for Cash loan received from father for reasonable cause

Ashok Kumar Bagaria Vs JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Since assessee had given reasonable cause for availing loan in cash from his father within the meaning of section 271D, therefore, he would be out of the rigours of levy of penalty under section 271D and no penalty could be levied....

Read More

Penalty for Failure to get accounts audited cannot be levied if books not maintained

Somnath Ghosh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Assessee assailed the imposition of penalty under section 271B imposed by AO on account of failure to get accounts audited under section 44AB. Assessee contended that penalty was not justified as no books of account were maintained by assessee....

Read More

Requirement of issuance of notice within prescribed time U/s. 143(2)

ITO Vs Globsyn Technologies Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

ITO Vs Globsyn Technologies Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)  is the contention of the ld. AR is that no notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was served within the stipulated time prescribed in the Act and the reassessment order was without jurisdiction and prayed to dismiss the appeal filed by the revenue. Further he submitted that the […]...

Read More

Retrospective amendment in section 9(1)(vi) cannot override India-Ireland DTAA

Ixia Technologies International Ltd. Vs ACIT(IT) (ITAT Kolkata)

Ixia Technologies International Ltd. Vs ACIT(IT) (ITAT Kolkata) Since assessee`s case is covered by beneficial provisions of the India-Ireland DTAA, hence the retrospective amendment made in the provisions of section 9(1)(vi) of the Act, which provides that royalty would include consideration for transfer of all or any rights in respect o...

Read More

Addition cannot be made by merely relying on 26AS

Mercury Car Rentals Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Mercury Car Rentals Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) During the course of assessment proceeding, the AO observed that assessee failed to reconcile interest income to the extent of Rs.67,939/- with its books of accounts and therefore added back the said amount as undisclosed interest income of the appellant as shown in the Form 26AS. [&hel...

Read More

Long-term capital loss on listed shares eligible for set-off against taxable income

M/s. United Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)

M/s. United Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) In this case the assessee had incurred loss on sale of shares after paying STT & these shares were held on investment a/c for period more than 12 months. The assessee claimed that the loss incurred was to be assessed under the head ‘capital gains’ and its set […]...

Read More

No addition u/s 68 for bogus LTCG without substantial evidence

L. K. Prahladka, HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Since assessee had brought all the relevant material to substantiate its claim that transactions of the purchase and sale of shares were genuine and AO had brought nothing controverting material to deny the same, therefore, the long term capital gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of M/s. KAFL claimed as exempt by assessee could not be treated ...

Read More

Section 68 not applies to Swapping of shares

ITO Vs Saffron Comtrade Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

This is a simple case of acquiring shares of certain companies from certain shareholders without paying any cash consideration and instead the consideration was settled through issuance of shares to the respective parties. That is, section 68 of I.T. Act, 1961 does not apply to cases of purchase of share assets and allotment of shares by ...

Read More

LTCG from penny stocks cannot be treated as bogus if documentation is in order and no fault found by AO

Chandra Prakash Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Chandra Prakash Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT The captioned appeal filed by the Assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2014-15, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-21, Kolkata, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer ...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,797)
Company Law (6,141)
Custom Duty (7,792)
DGFT (4,244)
Excise Duty (4,368)
Fema / RBI (4,240)
Finance (4,444)
Income Tax (33,438)
SEBI (3,518)
Service Tax (3,563)