Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 68 Addition Deleted for Want of Cross-Examination; Three Ingredients Proved – ITAT Kolkata

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Parvati Resources Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Parvati Resources Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) Sec 68 Addition Deleted – Identity, Creditworthiness Genuineness Proved – Reliance on Third-Party Info Without Cross-Examination Invalid – ITAT Kolkata ITAT Kolkata upheld CIT(A)’s order deleting addition of ₹1.85 Cr u/s 68 towards unsecured loan, holding that assessee had furnished complete documentary evidence including PAN, confirmations, bank statements and financials proving identity, creditworthiness & genuineness of lender group company. Tribunal observed that AO wrongly treated lender as shell company and relied on third-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *