The ITAT Jaipur ruled in ACIT vs Naresh Jain, addressing Section 115BBE, unexplained income, and the benefit of telescoping in tax assessments.
ITAT Jaipur upholds the deletion of ₹1.71 crore in excessive and bogus expenses in the case of ACIT vs Nisha Jain for AY 2013-14. The tribunal dismisses Revenue’s appeal citing lack of merit.
Explore the ITAT Jaipur ruling in ACIT vs. Naresh Jain, addressing key legal points, survey statements, and additions involving incriminating documents and unaccounted transactions in the 2017-18 assessment year.
Summary of the ITAT Jaipur decision in Singhal Builders Vs ACIT for A.Y. 2017-18, discussing income additions, depreciation claims, and treatment of interest on income tax refund.
ITAT Jaipur upheld the deletion of Rs. 72 lakh addition, ruling that the assessee sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits made during demonetization.
ITAT Jaipur held that in case the books of accounts are rejected by applying provisions of section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act then assessment must be completed under section 144 of the Income Tax Act which is not done by AO in the present case.
ITAT Jaipur held that there was short gap between three notices issued as say the opportunities granted hence it a fit case were one more opportunity should be granted in the proceedings before CIT(A), to enable the assessee to represent his appeals.
ITAT Jaipur held that with regard to the issue of registration u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act, the assessee require one more opportunity to represent the correct fact and produce the registration certificate under Rajasthan Public Trust Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) holding it to be barred by limitation unjustified as CIT(A) failed to consider that appeal was filed in physical form and filing of appeal is not delayed.
ITAT Jaipur rules in favor of Hitkari Vidyalaya Sahkari Shiksha Samiti Ltd, allowing 80P deduction on interest income from cooperative banks for AY 2017-18 & 2020-21.
