Delve into the detailed analysis of the ITAT Jabalpur’s decision in the case of Kalyanika Infra Mega Ventures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dy.C.I.T., exploring the implications of the judgment.
ITAT Jabalpur held that as per the sale deed what was purchased was only a plot of land for construction of residential house. However, in absence of construction of residential house thereon, exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act not admissible.
A R Transport Vs ADIT (ITAT Jabalpur) Amended provisions of Section 154 cannot be applied with retrospective effect in respect of an AY which precedes the year of amendment of the provisions
It is a clear case of an omission and, thus, non-application mind by the AO in the matter. That an absence or lack of enquiry, which ought to have been made under the circumstances, renders the order as erroneous in-so-far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, liable for revision u/s. 263,
Nikhil Mohine Vs DCIT (ITAT Jabalpur) Sec. 43B(b) does not include the employee contribution, and even regarding so is to no avail, rendering the Explanations under reference, even as suggested by their express language, explanatory. An examination of the Notes on Clauses to, and the Memorandum explaining the Provisions of, Finance Bill, 2021, however, resolves […]
The appellant failed to offer any explanation properly in support of the grounds raised in this appeal nor any supporting evidence were produced despite adequate opportunity having been provided. Since, in the instant case the appellant has not be able to show that the decision of the AO
Smt. Sarika Mittal Vs ACIT (ITAT Jabalpur) It is not in dispute that the AO in all the cases is of the rank of the Assistant Commissioner, i.e., below the rank of the Joint Commissioner. Similarly, the year of search being f.y. 2009-10, all the assessment years under reference, i.e., AYs. 2004-05 to 2010-11, are […]
ACIT Vs Mittal Roadways Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Jabalpur) From the above correspondence between the A.O. on one hand and the JCIT on the other hand and the letter addressed by the JCIT to the Commissioner clearly shows that it was at the stage of discussion and the JCIT could not able to make his mind. […]
Assessee has paid the service tax amount through banking channel. Challans of the payment of tax were placed on record before the assessing authority. The source of alleged service tax amount is well explained in the books of account.
In a recent ruling, the ITAT Jabalpur, decided the case in favour of the assesse, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer towards sundry creditors amounting to Rs. 5.07 lacs. The court held that under Section 68 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961
