Courts: ITAT Ahmedabad
Find latest ITAT Ahmedabad judgments, orders and case laws on income tax covering assessments, additions, deductions, exemptions, TDS, reassessment and penalties.
Rectification Invalid as Tax Rate Issue Debatable: ITAT Rejects 60% Section 115BBE Tax
No TDS Liability as Buyer’s Share Below ₹50 Lakh: ITAT Clarifies Section 194-IA Scope
Section 54 Deduction Issue Remanded for Failure to Consider Judicial Precedents
Include Previous Owner’s Holding Period for Inherited Property; Section 54EC Relief Allowed: ITAT Ahmedabad
Section 54F Deduction Allowed as Investment in Under-Construction Property Treated as Construction
BSNL VRS Compensation Exempt as Retrenchment Under Section 10(10B): ITAT Ahmedabad
Loose Sheets Found in Employee’s Two-Wheeler Not Valid Basis for Unaccounted Sales Addition
Sec 149(1)(b): Reopening Beyond 3 Years Only if Escaped Income amount to ₹50 lakh or more
Ex-Parte Assessment Reopened After Trust Produced Registration and Supporting Documents in Appeal
Revision Under Section 263 Invalid Because AO’s Order Was Not Prejudicial to Revenue
No separate notional interest adjustment when working capital adjustment made under TNMM
No Section 14A Disallowance Without Exempt Income: ITAT Deletes Addition in Investment Case
ITAT Remands Case Because CIT(A) Ignored Additional Evidence Filed by Assessee
Section 80G Deduction on CSR Donation Allowed Because Explanation to Section 37 Does Not Apply
ITAT Ahmedabad judgments and orders provide an extensive source of appellate case law under the Income-tax Act. This page compiles ITAT Ahmedabad decisions dealing with assessments, additions, deductions, exemptions, business income, capital gains, unexplained income, reassessment, TDS, transfer pricing, penalties and procedural issues. Taxpayers, businesses, Chartered Accountants, advocates and tax professionals can use this dedicated page to research Tribunal precedents relevant to income-tax controversies. TaxGuru brings together recent and important earlier ITAT Ahmedabad case laws, making it easier to follow developments in direct tax jurisprudence and identify decisions relevant to assessments and appeals.
