Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jalpa Uttapal Patel Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jalpa Uttapal Patel Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) No Addition, No Revision: ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes PCIT’s 263 Action in Alleged Bogus Purchase Case ITAT Ahmedabad “D” Bench, in Jalpa Uttapal Patel vs Pr. CIT, Ahmedabad-1 (ITA No. 720/Ahd/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 23-12-2025), set aside the revision order u/s 263, holding that the PCIT had wrongly assumed revisionary jurisdiction despite a proper and reasoned assessment by the AO. The case was originally reopened u/s 147 based on Insight Portal information alleging bogus purchase/sale transactions of ₹1.84 crore with M/s Kapishwar Steels...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930