Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manishaben Dilip Vankar Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manishaben Dilip Vankar Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Below ₹50 Lakh Escapement Quashed: Wrong Sanction, Wrong Jurisdiction—148 Notice Held Invalid Post-2021 Regime The Ahmedabad SMC Bench of the ITAT, in Manishaben Dilip Vankar vs DCIT (ITA No. 691/Ahd/2025, AY 2016-17), quashed the reassessment proceedings in entirety by holding that the reopening u/s 147 was barred by limitation and suffered from invalid sanction under the post-2021 reassessment regime. The Assessee’s original return was processed u/s 143(1) and later reopened based on INSIGHT Portal information...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930