The issue under consideration is whether the order for provincial attachment of bank accounts against bogus billing and fake generation of E-Way bills without the actual physical movement of goods is justified in law?
The GSTN upon receipt of the proposal from the Nodal Officer shall look into the same and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law, more particularly, keeping in mind the writ applicant should not suffer on account of any technical glitches.
Kohitoor Transport LLP Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The writ applicant availed the benefit of the interim-order passed by this Court and got the vehicle, along with the goods released on payment of the tax amount. The proceedings, as on date, are at the stage of show cause notice, under Section 130 of […]
A T Trading Company Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) In any circumstances, the authorities concerned cannot invoke Section 130 of the Act at the threshold, I.e., at the stage of detention and seizure. What we are trying to convey is that for the purpose of invoking Section 130 of the Act at the […]
PCIT Vs. Gulbrandsen Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Gujarat High Court) The Tribunal has taken into consideration the voluminous documentary evidence on record for the purpose of coming to the conclusion of adoption of TNMM by the assessee as the Most Appropriate Method of arriving at ALP. The Delhi High Court in the case of Make My […]
Prince Spintex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Chapter 5 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020 makes provision for the EPCG Scheme, which is an incentive scheme. The incentive given is that the importer holding a valid authorisation for capital goods covered under the EPCG Scheme would be exempted from payment of […]
Messrs Synpol Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Gujarat High Court) When the respondents had issued show cause notice demanding excise duty together with confiscation of the goods in terms of Rule 25 (a) and (d) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and redemption fine in lieu of confiscation under Rule-25 as goods were […]
It was submitted that in the absence of any discrepancy in the documents and the goods, it is not permissible for the respondents to confiscate either the vehicle or the goods.
Gokul Agro Resources Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) In the given case the HC have reached to the conclusion that no tax is leviable under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on the ocean freight for the services provided by a person located in a non-taxable territory by way of […]
In any circumstances, the authorities concerned cannot invoke Section 130 of the Act at the threshold, i.e., at the stage of detention and seizure. For the purpose of invoking Section 130 of the Act at the very threshold, the authorities need to make out a very strong case.
