Jagat Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Ld. AR submitted that assessee owned two properties, first property is a farm house situated at Dera Mandi, New Delhi and second property is Gobind Mension, Bharatpur. It is submitted that farm house situated at Dera Mandi, New Delhi is self occupied property, and second property at Bharatpur is […]
ACIT Vs Sunil Bakht (ITAT Delhi) The holding period of the assessee is minimum of 72 days and maximum of 186 days in the four schemes. The assessee contended before the ld CIT(A) that these are the only four transactions during the year. Magnitude of the investment coupled with the volume is also not much. […]
M/s Idea Cellular Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In the absence of any human intervention during the actual roaming process, payment would not be fee for technical services and cannot be regarded as payments to Section 194J are applicable. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT Challenging the order dated 18.3.2015 passed by the learned Commissioner of […]
Delhi Public School Ghaziabad Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee did not provide transport facility to the outsiders and was providing the same only to the students and the staff working for the society. Since transport facility was incidental to achieve the object of providing education, i.e., the object of the society, therefore, the transport […]
Rakesh Kumar Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi) The permissive right to use the SIM cards to get access to the phone network of the telecom companies is given only to the ultimate customers who have activated the connections. Thus, in the case of the telecom company, it is the owner of the prepaid voucher/SIM card and […]
DCIT Vs Star Wire Ind. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) It is pertinent to note that the Assessing Officer himself has recorded the statement of Shri Mohinder Kumar Gupta in the assessment order, wherein the Director of the Company has elaborated the transaction which was also confirmed by Mr. Kailash Chandra Agarwal. The assessee Company through its […]
DCIT Vs Moni Kumar Subba (ITAT Delhi) In the present case, the AO added notional interest on the interest free security for arriving at annual letting value. Since that was not permissible, the effect would be that such assessment was rightly set aside by the CIT (A) and the Tribunal. Therefore, the orders would not […]
Assessee is entitled to deduction u/s 10B of the Act in respect of the interest income earned on FDRs made for the purposes of keeping margin money or for availing any other credit facility from banks.
There was no new tangible material evidence brought on record by AO. Assessment was reopened only on the basis of details available on record and wrongly interpreted by AO.
Girdhari Lal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The test for determining whether the impugned land is agriculture bear mainly on the nature or character of the land, and not merely on the actual user or non-user at a particular point of time. If the land is not actually appropriated for agricultural purposes, the minimal requirement is […]
