Follow Us:

ITAT Delhi

Mere charging of fee from student would amount to uncharitable activity

August 29, 2018 4650 Views 0 comment Print

Rama devi memoria society Vs Jcit (ITAT Delhi) Ld. CIT(A) while denying the exemption of Section 11 to assessee society has held that, since imparting of education is a matter of pure charity, therefore, the educational institution is not permitted to receive or recover the cost of charity from its beneficiary by way of fees, […]

Annual expenses on WAN and & local hardware are allowable as revenue expenditure

August 29, 2018 672 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT Vs M/s Linde Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Assessee incurred license expenses towards WAN and local hardware, annual fee which has been treated by Assessing Officer to be capital expenditure. It is observed that assessee has to incur these expenses annually on which tax has been deducted. Assessee claimed license expenses of 49,62,461/- […]

TDS not deductible on payments on behalf of clients as C&F Agent

August 28, 2018 22086 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. KGL Network (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee-company made payments on behalf of its clients as Clearing and Forwarding (C&F)Agent which were reimbursed to the assessee-company. The  assessee-company did not make claim of deduction in the P & L A/c. Similar claim of assessee-company has been allowed in earlier and subsequent year, therefore, rule […]

Sec. 271(1)(c) Penalty not justified merely for disallowance of claim

August 28, 2018 18411 Views 1 comment Print

Jain Studios Ltd. & Anr. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)  Mere making of a claim which had not been accepted, would not per se tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars to attract penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Bare perusal of explanation furnished by the assessee went to prove that it had come up […]

Penalty U/s. 158BFA(2) not leviable when Assessment U/s. 158BC itself is Quashed

August 27, 2018 1047 Views 0 comment Print

Sh. Ravinder Taneja Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) As assessment under section 158BC itself has been quashed, thus, the penalty levied in respect of the income assessed under said assessment order cannot survive. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the lower authorities and cancel the penalty levied under section 158BFA(2) of the Act. FULL TEXT […]

IF Valuation referred by AO, then DVO valuation shall be final sale consideration for computing capital gain

August 27, 2018 11157 Views 0 comment Print

Sudha Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The assessing officer made the assessment order u/s 147/143(3). The only issue involved in this appeal is regarding computation of long term capital gain on sale of property located at Ghaziabad. The assessee has declared the long term capital gain on the sale of the said property claiming real […]

Non-consideration of decision of jurisdictional High Court is mistake apparent from record

August 26, 2018 4239 Views 0 comment Print

Vijay Sachdev Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) It is well settled law that non-consideration of decision of Jurisdictional High Court is mistake apparent from record. Ld. Counsel for the assessee, therefore, rightly contended that Ld.CIT(A) did not follow the judgement of the Jurisdictional High Court and shall have to rectify the mistake in his order in […]

Loss of security deposit against rented premises is business loss

August 25, 2018 4350 Views 0 comment Print

M/s Outworks Solutions [P] Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) No doubt, the assessee claimed write off as bed debt but it is equally true that the assessee did explain the sequence of events which prompted it for the said write off. There is no denying that the assessee does not fulfill the conditions mandated in […]

Product Development expense for existing line of business is revenue expenditure

August 25, 2018 4674 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Nov Sara India Pvt. Ltd Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Software development expenditure which was held to be capital expenditure by the Assessing Officer holding that it has given a benefit of enduring nature to the assessee. The claim of the assessee is that same is a license fee and, therefore, it cannot be […]

No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) if two legal interpretations were possible and Assessee acted in bonafide manner

August 24, 2018 2544 Views 0 comment Print

M/s Inspectorate Singapore Pte. Ltd.  Vs ADIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee was under the belief that due to the ‘make available’ Clause in Article 12 (4) (b) of India Singapore DTAA, the consideration paid by the Indian customers to assessee cannot be regarded as ‘fees for technical services’ and further since there was no transfer of technology […]

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031