Sanjeev Sarin Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case assessee has within stipulated period, made substantial investment towards purchase of new property and just because builder could not complete construction of residential house, claim of exemption under section 54F of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be denied. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This appeal […]
SF cannot be considered to be a payment made by the assessee airline. PSF is a payment made by the passenger which is only routed through the assessee airline. It is undisputed that the amount handed over by the assessee airline to the Airport Operators has also not been claimed as expenditure by the asssesee in its books of account.
No addition could have been made u/s 68 of the Act in view of the fact that no incriminating material was found during the course of search to which this impugned addition could be related.
Where assessee had erroneously taken credit for prepaid taxes on account of gross professional receipts as per Form 26AS ; then having regard to Rule 37BA, Revenue would be justified in denying credit for such amount of prepaid taxes which were not assessable during the year on the basis of regular method of accounting followed by the assessee.
DCIT Vs. PES Installations Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) In paper book filed before us at page 222, copy of remand report has been placed. Ld. AO observed therein that, mere filing PAN numbers or assessment particulars, VAT returns and copy of sales tax RC etc., do not establish identity of persons. He further notes that actual and true […]
DCIT Vs Avtec Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Deduction prescribed under section 10AA cannot be treated in the nature of exemption and as such, loss suffered by assessee in its unit eligible for deduction under section 10AA could be set off against normal business income. Keeping in view the fact that section 10AA makes the assessee eligible […]
Addition in respect of completed assessments u/s 153A be made solely on the basis of post search enquiry when no incriminating material was unearthed during search is not valid.
When assessee made it very clear in return of income that she was not maintaining any books of account, then, making addition under section 68 was untenable in law as section 68 was applicable only when credits were found in books of account of the assessee.
Process-cum-Product Development Centre Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Where assessee-society engaged only in imparting research based education/allowable skill training to students in manufacturing of sports goods and leisure equipments without any profit motive to enable them to get placement, it would cover within the definition of education u/s 2(15) and hence, entitled for exemption under […]
Mukta Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Long-term capital gains on sale of shares could not be treated as bogus on the reason that the price of these shares had risen manifolds and the reason for astronomical rise was not related to any fundamentals of market. Once the transactions were duly proved by trading from […]
