Bodycare Creations Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT find that the assessee has successfully demonstrated that the return of income filed by it has been subjected to provisions of Section 92E of the Act and consequently the due date available to the assessee is 30th November, 2017 relevant to Assessment Year 2017-18 in question in […]
Held that persons who have given loan are not present at their address which clearly shows the lack of genuineness of the transactions. Receipt of the amount in their bank accounts immediately before giving the loans further cast doubt of the creditworthiness.
Section 194A provision provides that obligation cast under Section 194IA is qua each transferee and not qua aggregate consideration.
Liquor license fee paid by assessee who is not license holder cannot be treated as eligible expenses & not allowable
Assessee firm has obtained loans from the sister concern on commercial basis. On facts it has emerged that the lender company has charged interest on advances made to assessee firm. The assessee has taken plea that the advances made by the lender company to the borrower assessee firm is not a loan/advance but is beset with the character of quid pro quo owing to charge of interest for the benefit of lender company.
In this case, AO pass order levying penalty amounting to Rs.6,62,100/- u/s 271C of Income Tax Act (being 2% of the EDC amount paid to HUDA).
Assessee has not received advisory notice issued u/s 285 BA (5) and the show cause notice of penalty u/s 271FA due to change of mail id and further contended that, the delay in filing the return was not deliberate.
Held that deduction from income claimed for payment made to a retired partners allowable as it amount to a diversion of income at source by overriding title.
Held that expenditure incurred in executing the project is an intangible asset which is eligible for depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act
ACIT Vs Genus Electrotech Limited (ITAT Delhi) Held that sales tax incentive subsidy and excise duty incentive are in the nature of capital receipts and thus not chargeable to tax as regular income as well as income u/s 115JB for computation of book profit. Facts- In the order u/s 154, AO noted that assessee had […]
