ITAT Delhi held that simultaneous issue of the DIN number is insignificant and superfluous exercise, in the absence of mentioning the DIN number on the body of AO’s order. Thus, Assessment order without DIN is void ab initio.
Read ITAT Delhi’s order on Rajiv Ghai vs. ACIT case. Deduction under section 54F allowed for house registered in parents’ name. Detailed analysis and conclusion.
Explore Grant Thornton India LLP case, unraveling complex international tax issues. Analysis of arguments, rulings, and broader implications for businesses in cross-border transactions.
ITAT Delhi held that without pointing out any specific defect in the audited books of accounts, AO cannot and should not make any estimated addition. Accordingly, such estimated addition deleted.
Explore the Ravinder Kumar vs ITO case at ITAT Delhi. Learn how the tribunal allowed capital gain deduction under section 54B for agricultural land purchased in the name of the spouse.
Explore the landmark ITAT Delhi ruling in Finesse Intl. Design Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT. CBDT Circular violation deems assessment order invalid. Know more!
TAT) Delhi in case of Chandan Lal Goswami vs. ITO sheds light on the eligibility of employees holding civil posts under a State for gratuity exemption under Section 10(10)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Addition made under Section 69 on account of the difference in excess stock of 22 Kt Gold and Polki Jewellery was not justified as the total weight of items of 22KT Gold jewelry and 22KT Gold Polki jewelry was 36,943 gms, and as per the estimated value, the difference was merely 113.50 gms, which was 0.32%.
Explore the ITAT Delhi order in ACIT Vs Vibha Taneja case for A.Y. 2014-15. Learn how the CIT(A) defended the assessee against unexplained money addition, citing possession and registered sale deed.
Addition under section 69A on account of actual cash arranged/paid by assessee to HKA was available with the assessee was not justified as “ownership” of money had not been recorded in the books of account and AO had made only presumption that the said cash was ‘available with the assessee’ without bringing on record any material in support thereof.
