Belated cross-objections– by over four years, in the opinion of the Court, meant that the appellants were seeking to rake up stale issues for which they had accepted the finality as regards their tax liability.
The notification notifying ICDS is contrary to the settled law since its implementation would nullify the judgements of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. This method of overriding the binding decision of Courts by the executive was contrary to law explained in Shri Prithvi Cotton Mills Limited v. Broach Borough Municipality (1969) 2 SCC 283.
M/S Atv Projects (India) Ltd Vs. Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Under the newly enacted Section 4(b) there are only two classes of persons, namely (i) those persons in whose cases schemes were sanctioned and (ii) those persons in whose cases the schemes were pending. In the former, there are two sub-classes […]
High Court of Delhi held Section 9(2)(g) of Delhi VAT Act to the extent it disallows Input tax credit to purchaser due to default of selling dealer in depositing tax, as violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India.
Admittedly,Company is not carrying out any businesss and its bank account has not been operated for over three years, petitioner ought to be provided benefit of CODS – 2018.
When the very basis of the reopening of the assessment having been eroded, notice under section 148 quashed in the case of Oracle
Teleworld Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes (Delhi High Court) Counsel for the respondents have submitted that illegality of seizure or survey or investigation would not affect admissibility and relevancy of the evidence collected. The said evidence as per the respondent is admissible and decisions in M. Malkani versus State of Maharashtra, […]
It is obvious that the appeals should be listed on the judicial side, even if, there is an issue or debate with regard to the territorial jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Such matters cannot be decided on the Administrative side, by the Registry of the CESTAT, even when it is of the opinion that the appellants have not approached the right or correct Bench of the Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction.
Whether the ITAT has committed an error of law in upholding the dis allowance of Rs. 3,08,79,171 in respect of Sales Tax Recoverable account, under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act?
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court directed that the Condonation of Delay Scheme on its official website with a view to ensure that wide publicity is given to the scheme.
