Seventh Plane Network Private ltd. Vs. Union of India & ORS. ( Delhi High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the petitioner was eligible to apply under the SVLDRS, 2019 even if the amount of duty involved in the audit had not been quantified before 30th June, 2019? High Court states that, the audit […]
High Court direct GST authorities to decide Question of IGST & Duty Drawback
Gaurav Yadav & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) (a) What items are to be included under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 as ‘Essential Commodity’, is a policy decision of the respondent/Government and, therefore, unless the decision can be shown to be manifestly unreasonable or arbitrary, this Court will be extremely […]
whether application filed under the SVLDR Scheme rejected on the sole ground that the demand was neither quantified without giving opportunity of being heard is justified in law?
Whether the public interest litigation (PIL) challenging non-inclusion of advocates in the definition of the word ‘professionals’ under the MSMED Act, 2006 will be entertained by High Court?
Cooner Institute of Health Care And Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court Direction To Release Refund Withheld Without Valid Reasons And Based On Flawed Assumption only ground for withholding refund is that since case of the petitioner has been selected for scrutiny for AY 2018-19, under Section 143(2) of […]
U.C. Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner tried to file TRAN -1 form within the time provided under Rule 117 as well as the extended time given by this Court vide judgment dated 05th May, 2020 in Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. Vs. […]
Data Transmission Services did not amount to royalty in terms of Article 12 of the Indo-Thai Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to remove technical glitches and enable the TRACES portal so that petitioner can file its refund application for the excess Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) deposited by it.
The issue under consideration is whether prosecution u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act can be levied for dishonour of a cheque on cheque having difference in the amount in figures and words?