whether application filed under the SVLDR Scheme rejected on the sole ground that the demand was neither quantified without giving opportunity of being heard is justified in law?
Whether the public interest litigation (PIL) challenging non-inclusion of advocates in the definition of the word ‘professionals’ under the MSMED Act, 2006 will be entertained by High Court?
Cooner Institute of Health Care And Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court Direction To Release Refund Withheld Without Valid Reasons And Based On Flawed Assumption only ground for withholding refund is that since case of the petitioner has been selected for scrutiny for AY 2018-19, under Section 143(2) of […]
U.C. Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner tried to file TRAN -1 form within the time provided under Rule 117 as well as the extended time given by this Court vide judgment dated 05th May, 2020 in Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. Vs. […]
Data Transmission Services did not amount to royalty in terms of Article 12 of the Indo-Thai Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to remove technical glitches and enable the TRACES portal so that petitioner can file its refund application for the excess Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) deposited by it.
The issue under consideration is whether prosecution u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act can be levied for dishonour of a cheque on cheque having difference in the amount in figures and words?
Due to COVID-19 pandemic high court approves that Patanjali can deposits the amount of penalty in question in the consumer welfare fund in six monthly installments.
Uflix Industries Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Present writ petition has been filed challenging the attachment orders dated 18th March, 2020 and 10th June, 2020 passed by respondent no. 3 attaching the bank account of the Petitioner on the grounds that they have been issued without jurisdiction as well as authority […]
he Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India Ltd.) v. Income Tax Officer 259 ITR 19 (SC) has clarified that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the notice is to file a return and if he so desire, to seek reasons for issuing notices.
