Delhi High Court revokes orders demanding 40% pre-deposit by AO & Principal Commissioner in Sushen Mohan Gupta vs. PCIT case, citing failure to assess merits and consider undue hardship. Full text of the judgment available.
Delhi High Court held that initiation of reassessment based on entirely new or previously undisclosed material or reasoning deprives assessee’s right to effectively object the proposed reassessment action. Accordingly, the impugned action is rendered wholly unsustainable.
Petition challenges CGST order for FY 2018-19 as unreasoned, leading court to stay the order and seek detailed affidavits on similar cases.
Delhi High Court held that petitioner is duly entitled for interest under section 42(1) of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (the DVAT Act) since refund withheld unjustifiably.
The department issued notice u/s. 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging that the petitioner had received loan from its 100% subsidiary i.e., Gul Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Associated Chambers of Commerce And Industry of India Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that action of reassessment merely on the allegation of delayed digital filing of Form 10 without based on the formation of an opinion that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Facts- […]
Delhi High Court held that in case of search, block period of ten years for search assessment, would not be attracted in case the search has taken place before 1st April 2017.
Delhi High Court held that services provided for conducting screening test and the fees charged for accrediting medical institutions does not fall within the scope of Serial No.66(a) and Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification and hence not exempt from payment of GST.
Delhi High Court held that once the Tribunal had called upon the AO to examine the issue afresh, the said direction could not have been disregarded by reference to a Circular No. 549 dated 31 October 1989 issued by the CBDT.
Delhi High Court upholds CESTAT ruling, stating suspension revocation of Custom Broker license doesn’t impede penalty inquiry. Vijendra Singh’s appeal dismissed.
