Follow Us:

CESTAT Mumbai

Duty Demand Quashed: DGH Certificate Cannot Add Conditions Beyond Notification

April 21, 2026 282 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that exemption cannot be denied based on a re-export condition imposed through a DGH certificate when such a requirement is absent in the notification.

Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable When Demand Arises from Audit Records

April 21, 2026 393 Views 0 comment Print

The order highlights that both improper issuance of notices and incorrect application of law led to invalid recovery proceedings. The Tribunal set aside the demand and granted relief to the appellants.

Activity trackers/fitness band classifiable under CTI 8517 as communicable device: CESTAT Mumbai

April 19, 2026 390 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Mumbai held that activity trackers/fitness band are classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8517 6290 as communicable device and not under Customs Tariff Item 9029 1090 as pedometer. Accordingly, classification done by department accepted.

ARC Trustee Services Not Taxable as Banking Services; ₹50 Cr Demand Set Aside on Mutuality Principle

April 18, 2026 342 Views 0 comment Print

The issue involved taxability of management and incentive fees earned by an asset reconstruction company. The tribunal set aside the demand due to incorrect classification and invalid invocation of extended limitation.

Proportionate CENVAT Reversal Treated as Separate Records; Full Credit Demand Set Aside: CESTAT Mumbai

April 7, 2026 315 Views 0 comment Print

The tribunal held that proportionate reversal of credit for trading is sufficient compliance. It ruled that full reversal under Rule 6(3A) is not mandatory.

Service Tax Demand Set Aside Due to Need for Verification of RCM Payment by Recipient

April 4, 2026 444 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal examined a demand based on discrepancies between ITR data and service tax returns. It held that verification of tax payment under RCM by the recipient was necessary before confirming liability. 

CENVAT Credit Allowed as Delivery Terms Establish Buyer’s Premises as Place of Removal

April 4, 2026 993 Views 0 comment Print

The case examined denial of credit on GTA services for outward transportation. The Tribunal held that FOR delivery terms made the buyer’s premises the place of removal, allowing credit.

Payment of Duty Under Protest Not Treated as Appealable Order: CESTAT Mumbai

April 4, 2026 432 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal allowed concessional duty on imported goods after noting that earlier decisions in identical matters had already settled the issue. It held that reliance on a set-aside order was unsustainable. The key takeaway is that binding precedents must be followed, and overturned orders cannot be relied upon.

CESTAT allows Amendment of Shipping Bills Due to Absence of Time Limit During Transition Period

April 2, 2026 591 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that time limits introduced later cannot apply retrospectively to deny amendment requests. The ruling clarifies that exporters can seek corrections for past errors during scheme transitions.

Duty demand set aside as no evidence proved manufacture of gutka before installation of pouch packing machine

March 28, 2026 234 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Mumbai held that demand of duty on manufacture of pan-masala/gutka cannot be sustained since there was no evidence which proved that manufacturing activity took place before installation of pouch packing machine.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031