This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reducing Higher Declared Value to Impose ADD Not Permissible Under Rule 12: CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Surbhit Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Surbhit Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
The appeals arose from an order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (NS-I), JNCH, Nhava Sheva, confirming rejection of the declared transaction value of imported melamine and imposing Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD), interest, redemption fines, and penalties on the importing companies and associated individuals. The imports involved 38 consignments by Surbhit Impex Pvt. Ltd. (SIPL) and B.M. Jain & Sons Pvt. Ltd. (BMJSPL), the latter having merged with SIPL pursuant to an NCLT order dated 06.05.2022. The investigation was initiate...
