Case Law Details
Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Introduction: The recent case of Bharti Airtel Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs at CESTAT Bangalore has stirred discussions in the telecom industry. The dispute revolves around the classification and customs duty exemption eligibility of Battery Fuse Units (BFU) imported by Bharti Airtel. Let’s delve into the details and implications of this ruling.
Detailed Analysis: Bharti Airtel imported Battery Fuse Units under Chapter Heading 8529 9090, claiming them as parts of Base Transmission Stations (BTS) for telecom use, seeking exemption under a specific notification. However, the classification dispute arose when the authorities classified the items under Chapter Heading 8536, denying the benefit of the notification.
The crux of the matter lies in determining whether BFUs should be classified under Chapter Heading 8529 as parts of transmission apparatus or under Chapter Heading 8536 as electrical apparatus for switching or protecting circuits. Bharti Airtel argued that BFUs are integral parts of BTS and thus belong to Chapter Heading 8529. They cited technical literature and legal precedents to support their claim.
On the other hand, the Revenue contended that BFUs should be classified under Chapter Heading 8536 based on technical literature and customs tariff headings. They argued that BFUs primarily function as automatic circuit breakers, aligning with the description under 8536.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
