ITAT Delhi upholds penalty under Section 271(1)(b) against Sanjay Dalmia for not signing consent waiver form related to undisclosed HSBC bank account details.
ITAT Kolkata rules on property valuation under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and jurisdiction in limited scrutiny cases for AY 2014-15, allowing Nisha Gupta’s appeal.
ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69 towards unexplained investment merely based on loose sheets without any corroborative evidences is unsustainable in law. Also held that addition on the basis of mere assumption and presumption not sustainable.
ITAT Agra held that evidences with regard to deposit of income tax deducted at source (TDS) filed for the first time before ITAT hence appeal allowed with direction to AO to verify the documents.
In the matter abovementioned ITAT Pune after relying upon the decision of jurisdictional HC held that assessee was eligible for deduction u/sec.80P(2)(a) (i) on the Interest earned by assessee.
ITAT Chennai held that payments are in the nature of selling commission to foreign agents who is not having permanent establishment or business connection in India is not taxable in India and accordingly, TDS u/s. 195 not deductible.
ITAT Chandigarh deletes ₹32 lakh addition against Pawan International, ruling cash deposits from opening stock sales cannot be treated as unexplained income.
ITAT Chennai remands ₹36.5 lakh unexplained loans case for reconsideration after assessee fails to provide sufficient evidence of creditors’ financial capacity.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that non-compliance to notices issued u/s. 250 by CIT(A) resulted into delayed appellate proceedings. Accordingly, cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the assessee for lack of diligence.
The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue’s plea on Section 14A disallowance, ruling that the amendment introduced in Finance Act 2022 is not retrospective.
