The ITAT upheld the denial of 80G registration to a trust, ruling that a trust with explicit religious objects in its deed does not qualify for tax benefits.
ITAT Vishakhapatnam held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) merely on account of non-prosecution by the assessee without disposing off on merits is not justifiable. Accordingly, order set aside and matter restored to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai held that depreciation on the business/commercial rights arising from the manufacturing contracts, supply contracts and maintenance contracts as claimed by the assessee is allowable. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Hyderabad held that addition towards bogus purchases based on supporting documentary evidence, without carrying out necessary verification from GST department, cannot be sustained. Accordingly, matter restored back to file of AO for re-adjudication.
The issue was regarding the disallowance of depreciation and expenses on retention money. Assessee had purchase contracts with retention money payable after successful performance of machinery and recorded the liability under the mercantile system.
The ITAT Agra has canceled a penalty against Bundelkhand University, ruling that a technical breach of not filing documents is not punishable if all details are later provided.
ITAT Hyderabad held that rejection of books during assessment proceedings does not retrospectively nullify the obligation to comply with section 44AB of the Income Tax Act within the prescribed time. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B upheld.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has given the Stellin Foundation another chance to seek registration under Sections 12AB and 80G, setting aside a denial and ordering a new hearing. The tribunal condoned a 19-day delay in the appeal filing, citing sufficient cause.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Jodhpur has set aside an order that led to the double taxation of income, instructing the tax authorities to correct a taxpayer’s inadvertent error. The ruling distinguishes a key judicial precedent to prevent an unjust outcome.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Visakhapatnam has set aside an order by the CIT(Exemptions) that denied permanent registration to Bethany Chapel, citing a lack of detailed reasons and violating the principles of natural justice.
