ITAT Mumbai held that CIT(A) is not vested with any power to summarily dismiss the appeal on account of non prosecution. CIT(A) remains under statutory obligation to dismiss appeal on merits. Accordingly, matter remanded back to CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
The ITAT has fixed the fair market value of land at Rs. 60/sq.m. for capital gains calculation and directed the tax authorities to re-examine a taxpayer’s deduction claim under Section 54.
The ITAT Pune has remitted the case of Mahesh Padmnabhrao Kashikar back to the CIT(A), allowing the individual a fresh chance to explain cash deposits in a joint bank account after previously failing to cooperate.
ITAT Delhi has sent an unexplained cash deposit case back to CIT(A), giving an individual a new chance to prove that the funds were from his father’s land sale.
ITAT Hyderabad directed to reconsider claim of concessional tax rate benefit u/s. 115BAA of the Income Tax Act since Form 10-IC filed belatedly but was filed before cut-off date i.e. 30.06.2022 as prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 6/2022. Accordingly, appeal allowed for statistical purpose.
The ITAT Rajkot has deleted a disallowance under Section 40A(3), ruling that the provision applies to individual payments against a single bill, not the aggregate of multiple payments below Rs. 20,000 each.
ITAT Ahmedabad partly allows trust’s appeal, condones delay in filing Form 10B, and remands matter to CIT(A) for reconsideration of Rs. 41.31L disallowance.
The ITAT has declared an assessment against SoftwareONE India Pvt. Ltd. void, ruling that an assessment framed in the name of a non-existent, merged entity is invalid, citing a Supreme Court precedent.
The ITAT Surat has set aside a CIT(E) order that rejected a trust’s registration. Citing a missed email as the reason for non-compliance, the court ordered a fresh hearing.
The ITAT Cochin has dismissed an appeal from a chit fund company, upholding a 90% disallowance of commission expenses due to a lack of supporting documentation and unreasonableness.
