The ITAT Pune has quashed a tax assessment order against Pramod Manikchand Dugad, ruling that the Assessing Officer violated a key judicial precedent by finalizing the assessment less than four weeks after rejecting the taxpayer’s objections.
ITAT Pune has granted partial relief to an assessee, deleting a ₹5 lakh disallowance related to an unexplained cash deposit. Tribunal, however, upheld disallowance of a ₹10 lakh cash gift, ruling that an unregistered gift deed with no witnesses was insufficient evidence, especially when donor was deceased.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed a tax appeal by Workenstein Collaborative Spaces Pvt. Ltd., ruling that a company cannot be held responsible for its suppliers’ failure to file returns or respond to notices.
In a landmark ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that tax disallowance under Section 14A must be limited to investments that yielded exempt income, dismissing the tax department’s appeal against Nippon Life.
ITAT Chandigarh deletes a Rs.59.50 lakh addition, ruling that a school with receipts under Rs.1 crore is fully exempt under Section 10(23C)(iiiad), making Section 11(5) restrictions inapplicable.
ITAT Chandigarh rules for Aarti Singal, deleting additions u/s 68 & 69C. LTCG from listed shares held genuine & not bogus accommodation entries, as Revenue failed to provide specific proof.
Tribunal deletes all additions against Lakhvir Kaur, finding no incriminating material. The ruling concerned foreign travel, vehicle expenses, and jewellery for A.Y. 2020-21, along with a poultry farm on-money addition for A.Y. 2021-22.
The ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favor of an assessee, deleting an addition of ₹8.70 lakh. The tribunal found loans from close relatives and sons were genuine, with donors having sufficient income.
A charitable trust cannot be denied Section 80G approval solely for having religious objects. The ITAT ruled that actual expenditure is the key factor.
The ITAT Chandigarh has quashed an assessment based on a WhatsApp chat, citing lack of mandatory approval and insufficient evidence. The tribunal upheld the deletion of a Rs. 1.12 crore addition for unexplained investment, emphasizing that digital communication alone requires corroboration.
