Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lakhvir Kaur Vs DCIT/ACIT(Cen)-2 (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lakhvir Kaur Vs DCIT/ACIT(Cen)-2 (ITAT Chandigarh) For A.Y. 2020-21, AO assessed income at ₹85.68 lakhs with additions including: (i) ₹8 lakhs foreign travel, (ii) ₹6.93 lakhs vehicle expenses, (iii) ₹3.19 lakhs interest disallowance, (iv) ₹34,110 jewellery. CIT(A) restricted total additions to ₹7.11 lakhs by partly sustaining travel (₹4 lakhs), vehicle (₹2.77 lakhs), & jewellery (₹34,110). Tribunal found that foreign trip was funded by husband & daughter, with evidence of payment through bank & accepted facts. No incriminating material was found during search. Th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930