The ITAT Jaipur ruled that cash deposits explained by recorded sales cannot be added solely on an uncorroborated survey statement, upholding assessee’s appeal.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment order passed on the basis of consolidated approval under section 153D of the Income Tax Act in mechanical manner without application of mind is void-ab-initio and hence assessment is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeals are allowed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Pune ruled that dismissing an appeal under Section 249(4)(b) for non-payment of advance tax is unjustified when the assessee, a cooperative society,
ITAT Panaji ruled that cooperative societies can claim a deduction under Section 80P even if they filed their return late, but only for assessment years (AYs) prior to 2018-19.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest on housing loan is allowed to be included in cost of acquisition of capital asset under section 48 of the Income Tax Act provided the same is not claimed as deduction u/s. 24(b). Accordingly, matter restored back to AO for verification.
ITAT Delhi held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is not justifiable since proper enquiry and examination was made and therefore, there is no error in the order of the AO thus, it is not pre-judicial to the interest of the Revenue.
The ITAT Kolkata quashed a penalty on a taxpayer, ruling that a one-time settlement from an employer was a capital receipt. The court held that no concealment of income occurred as the amount was disclosed in the tax return.
The ITAT Kolkata dismisses the Revenue’s appeal, ruling that a ₹1.59 crore addition for alleged bogus sales was unfounded, as the company provided substantial evidence including e-way bills and bank statements.
The ITAT dismisses a tax addition on Hitesh Trading Company, finding the Assessing Officer’s estimation of a higher gross profit was arbitrary and lacked legal justification.
ITAT deleted an addition of ₹3.80 lakh made towards leave encashment under Section 43B, ruling that the Commissioner of Principal Commissioner (CPC) had no jurisdiction to make the addition.
