Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kushal Sengupta Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kushal Sengupta Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted ₹5.28 lakh penalty under Section 271(1)(c), holding that the one-time settlement received from Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance was a capital receipt and fully disclosed in the return. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata Bench, has quashed a penalty of ₹5,28,234 levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against Kushal Sengupta for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The penalty was imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) and upheld by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930