The ITAT Ranchi has remanded the case of Pravin Engineering Pvt. Ltd. back to the Assessing Officer. The company’s claim that a ₹11.36 lakh directors’ commission was incorrectly reported as a dividend was not considered by the lower authorities.
The ITAT Mumbai has set aside a tax order, remanding the ₹1.1 crore unexplained property investment case of Rajesh Laxmichand Jain back to the Assessing Officer for fresh review, citing procedural errors.
The ITAT Mumbai quashed the reassessment notice against Saif Ali Khan (AY 2016-17), holding the AO improperly obtained approval from the Pr. CIT instead of the Pr. CCIT for reopening beyond the three-year limit.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai dismisses the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the deletion of a ₹80 lakh unexplained investment addition.
Delhi ITAT restores Silverton Pulp And Papers Pvt. Ltd.’s appeal to the CIT(A) to verify the applicability of Section 56(2)(x)(b) to a disputed agricultural land purchase, where the stamp valuation authority valued it as residential.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that the allotment of a flat to the assessee during AY 2007-08 does not attract tax under Section 56(2)(v), as the provision at that time applied only to money received, not immovable property.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has deleted a tax disallowance of Rs. 2.3 lakh made against the Engineering Mazdoor Sabha trade union for compensation payments to its members.
ITAT, Pune, set aside CIT (Exemption)’s rejection of an educational trust’s applications for Section 12A registration and Section 80G approval.
ITAT Kolkata deleted the ₹1.31 lakh unexplained cash addition during demonetisation, ruling the deposit was reasonably sourced from the assessee’s disclosed rental income received in cash.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that a Co-op Society cannot claim Section 80P(2)(d) deduction on interest from Regional Rural Bank deposits, as an RRB isn’t a co-operative society after 2010.
