Dismissing Revenue’s appeal, the Tribunal held that the assessee’s ₹1.9 crore FDR was a renewal of an earlier deposit used as bank guarantee security and not a new unexplained investment under Section 69.
ITAT Chandigarh allows the appeal of Ram Gopal Temple Trust against the CIT(E)’s rejection of its Section 12A registration application, holding that a statute-notified religious institution is not required to furnish a trust deed.
ITAT ruled that Thane Zilla Vidyasevak Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd. is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on Rs. 94.12 lakh interest income earned from deposits in a co-operative bank. Tribunal affirmed that a co-operative bank is classified as a co-operative society for this deduction.
ITAT Mumbai allowed Saurashtra Cement’s appeal, ruling that disallowance under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D cannot be made if Assessee did not earn any exempt income during financial year. Ruling deletes an addition of ₹1.15 crore.
Tribunal remanded case to CIT(A), holding that assessee’s Section 80P deduction claim must be reconsidered after CCIT Coimbatore decides condonation petition under Section 119(2)(b).
The ITAT Chennai held that ₹1.98 crore received for reduction in profit-sharing ratio in CRCL LLP was not goodwill or taxable income under the Income Tax Act.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2015-16 due to the tax effect falling below the CBDT’s prescribed limit of Rs. 60 lacs. For AY 2020-21, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the deletion of additions for dies for new model development and productivity maintenance expenditure based on judicial consistency.
ITAT Pune held that assessee was engaged in livestock transport on commission basis and not in trading, directing AO to apply 1.5% profit rate instead of 8% estimated earlier.
ITAT restricted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to 50% on a jointly purchased property, preventing double addition as the co-owner was already taxed on the balance.
ITAT restored a disallowance of ₹18.76 Cr under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194Q to CIT(A), granting assessee a fresh opportunity. Mumbai ITAT remanded a tax appeal concerning substantial business purchases, directing CIT(A) to hear assessee on merits for non-compliance.
