Dismissing the AO’s view that interest should be restricted to months of operation, Tribunal allowed full claim, reaffirming that partner interest accrues on financial year-end.
Chennai ITAT remanded an ex parte assessment back to the CIT(A) after the assessee filed an affidavit promising full cooperation and no adjournments. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Delhi ITAT set aside income addition under Section 44AD, holding that Assessing Officer acted beyond his powers in a limited scrutiny case meant only for verifying cash deposits.
The ITAT Chennai restored a trust’s appeal to the AO to verify if the asset’s cost was allowed as application of income before disallowing depreciation under Section 11(6) of the Income Tax Act.
Tribunal held that CPC cannot treat entire receipts of a registered charitable trust as taxable income under Section 143(1). Intimation was quashed as beyond permissible scope of adjustment.
The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against Mangalvani Exports Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2019-20 because the tax effect was below the CBDT’s ₹60 lakh monetary limit.
Tribunal sent back case to CIT(Exemption) after noting that assessee’s Form 10AB was filed before CBDT Circular No. 7/2024, which extended due date to 30 June 2024. The matter will be reconsidered afresh in view of updated circular.
While upholding part of addition under Section 2(22)(e), ITAT Mumbai directed Assessing Officer to restrict deemed dividend amount only to extent of accumulated profits of lending company.
ITAT Mumbai dismisses Revenues appeal, ruling that Goodwill from a High Court-approved amalgamation is a depreciable intangible asset under Section 32, rejecting the claim that it represents non-depreciable land value.
ITAT Surat rules company’s capital contribution to a partnership firm for business purposes is not a loan or advance, thus escaping deemed dividend tax u/s 2(22)(e).
