Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Overview of Form STK-2 under Section 248(2), covering eligibility, ineligible companies, documents, process, filing fee and ROC pr...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and f...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for altering the Object Clause under Section 13, filing Form MGT-14, and SEBI LODR compliance for listed co...
Company Law : Article explains the provisions governing appointment of proxies under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 19 of the C...
Company Law : Legal Provision and Obligations for a company with respect to Securities issues by Private Placement This Article outlines the leg...
Company Law : ICSI will provide CSEET June 2026 evaluated answer books through its portal from 16 July 2026 without RTI, subject to prescribed t...
Company Law : ICSI declared the CSEET June 2026 results on 15 July 2026. The pass percentage is 67.59%, and e-Result-cum-Marks Statements are av...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged PESB to recognize Company Secretaries as eligible for Board-level and Functional Director positions in CPSEs. The r...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : NCLAT set aside directions to hand over two properties to the RP, holding Civil Court-recognised possessory rights could not be di...
Company Law : NCLAT dismissed the IRP's appeal, upheld ₹3 lakh remuneration and held reliance on K. Sashidhar was distinguishable in the fee d...
Company Law : Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entit...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections fro...
Company Law : NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence o...
Company Law : ICMAI advised PCMAs to ensure accurate CRA-2 and CRA-4 filings, follow Rule 6 timelines, and use a verification checklist to avoid...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 450 for delayed filing of Form PAS-6 under Rule 9A despite subsequent compliance with ...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed a ₹1.5 lakh penalty under Section 159 for possessing a duplicate DIN in violation of Section 155 despite vol...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 203(5) for a 48-day delay in appointing a Whole-time Company Secretary under Section 2...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalty under Sections 203(5) and 454 for 38-day delay in appointing a Whole-Time Company Secretary by a liste...
ROC Cuttack imposed Section 137(3) penalties for failure to file FY 2016-17 financial statements, including ₹2 lakh on the company.
ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 137(3) for failure to file FY 2013-14 financial statements and directed rectification within 90 days.
ROC Coimbatore imposed Section 450 penalties on a company and its officer for clerical errors in AOC-4 authorisation details for four financial years.
ROC Coimbatore imposed Section 450 penalties for clerical errors in MGT-7 authorisation details across four financial years on the company and two officers.
ROC Cuttack imposed Section 137(3) penalties for failure to file FY 2014-15 financial statements, with the company fined ₹2 lakh and directors ₹50,000 each.
ROC Coimbatore imposed Section 450 penalties for clerical errors in MGT-7 authorisation details across four financial years.
Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entitled to a pre-cognizance hearing under the first proviso to Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections from stakeholders.
NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence of material objections.
Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and financial disclosures.
