Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Company Law

IRP Not Entitled to Monthly Fees Without CoC Approval: NCLAT Delhi

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mohd Nazim Khan Vs HDFC Bank Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLAT
Advertisement
Mohd Nazim Khan Vs HDFC Bank Limited (NCLAT Delhi) The appeal arose from the order dated 10.12.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, in IA No. 343/2021, whereby the Adjudicating Authority directed the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to pay the appellant, the erstwhile Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), ₹3,00,000 as remuneration and ₹91,308 towards verified expenses as CIRP costs, while declining his claim for ₹29,23,308. The appellant contended that he served as IRP from 08.08.2019 until his replacement on 20.11.2020 and continued to discharge the functions ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,080

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *