The court ordered the release of gold jewellery seized at IGI Airport, ruling that the items were brand new and imposed costs for misrepresenting them as old.
The applicant requested withdrawal of an advance ruling on Red Seaweed Calcium classification before issuance, and CAAR approved the withdrawal under Regulation 20.
Tribunal held that amounts incurred as authorized pure-agent payments could not form part of taxable value. The ruling clarifies that failure to interpret Rule 5(2) correctly invalidated the demand.
Supreme Court dismissed the challenge, leaving intact the High Court ruling that registration under Section 12AA could not be denied when the institution’s educational objectives and utilization of income met statutory requirements.
Patna High Court ruled that pre-deposit of 10% of disputed tax for CGST/BGST appeals cannot be made via Electronic Credit Ledger (ECRL), upholding mandatory use of Electronic Cash Ledger (ECL).
The High Court set aside a GST order against Sanjay Medicos, granting the petitioner time to reply to the SCN and a personal hearing, while leaving notification validity to the Supreme Court.
The Court held that Form 9A was not applicable to Assessment Year 2015–16 and that the option under Section 11(1) had been validly exercised through Form 10B and the return. The rejection order was quashed.
Tribunal held that ₹15 crore received for withdrawing a civil suit was not consideration for transfer of a capital asset. It ruled that the assessee only gave up a right to sue, which is not taxable as capital gains.
The Tribunal held that section 13(1)(b) did not apply to a trust formed before 1961 and directed grant of registration. The key issue was whether activities for a Scheduled Caste community invalidated the application.
The Court held that pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations must be verified before issuing SVLDRS-3. The decision emphasizes the committee’s duty to ensure accurate calculation under the Scheme.
