The Court examined whether the dispute involved a classification issue requiring the petitioners to pursue statutory remedies or whether the writ petitions were maintainable.
The Gauhati High Court set aside a GST registration cancellation after finding the order contained no reasons and was not a speaking order. It held that statutory authorities must record reasons while cancelling registration.
ITAT condoned the filing delay and remanded the case to the CIT(E) to examine whether the trust satisfies all 80G requirements.
ITAT held Form 10AB was filed beyond the prescribed time but permitted the trust to seek CBDT condonation under Section 119(2)(b) before merits are examined.
MahaRERA granted delayed possession interest till OC and directed correction of flat number from 701 to 702 after unilateral renumbering by the promoter.
Madras High Court allowed a delayed appeal without limitation as the GST on royalty issue is pending before the Supreme Court.
The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside the appointment order after finding the first two nominations were made through secondment arrangements and were ineligible.
Madras High Court stayed GST recovery on royalty and directed authorities to await the Supreme Court’s decision on the pending issue.
SC upheld dismissal as the petitioner bypassed the statutory appeal and filed a delayed writ without sufficient explanation.
unjab & Haryana HC dismissed the GST writ as delayed, holding unexplained delay and failure to pursue statutory appeal barred relief.
