Rahul M. Vadodariya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT held that Ld. CIT(A) has not approached the matter judiciously and has dismissed the appeal of the assessee, by rejecting the application for condonation of delay, without assigning any specific reasons why the delay in filing appeal should not be condoned. There is no allegation to the […]
Explore the details of Rahul Udyog’s appeal against ITO, focusing on TDS disallowance and business expenses. Analysis of Hamali, Jalau Lakdi, Bardana expenses, and interest disallowance.
A. Whether multiple consignments against a CHIMS registration can be imported within the validity period of CHIMS Registration? Response: Importer may include multiple products in one registration number. However, for each shipment a separate registration number is required.
Applicability of GST rate of 5% (CGST 2.5% + SGST 2.5%) on marine engines of heading 8407, being the part of fishing vessel of heading 8902, as per Entry Serial No.252 of Schedule I of Notification No.1/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 & State Notification No. S.R.O.360/2017.
Draft Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Staff (Officers and other Employees) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2022
Explore Ravindra Dattu Jadhav vs. ITO case: Uncovering undisclosed income in land trading, agricultural activity dispute. ITAT Pune modifies CIT(A) order, restricts addition to 50%.
Explore the ITAT Chennai ruling in Col. D. Pradeep Kumar vs. DCIT regarding the disallowance of Service Tax under section 43B. ITAT directs the AO to verify and limit the disallowance
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling in Garg Acrylics Ltd case. Detailed analysis of alleged bogus purchases, challenges to statement validity, and successful reversal of unjustified additions.
Explore the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Chirai Salt (India) Pvt. Ltd case. In-depth analysis of the stock undervaluation dispute, challenges to methods, and successful deletion of additions.
The issue in the present case relates whether the assessment order has been passed by Ld. AO without making inquiries or verification with respect to the deduction/exemption claimed under section 54 of the Act as discussed above and hence the assessment is erroneous insofar prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and thus requiring revision by Pr. CIT u/s 263 of the Act.
