This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT restricts addition to 50% for non-furnishing of requisite detail related to refund of advances from customers
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ravindra Dattu Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ravindra Dattu Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Introduction: The case of Ravindra Dattu Jadhav vs. ITO, heard at ITAT Pune, involves an individual engaged in small-scale land trading and agricultural activities. The Assessing Officer treated a significant bank deposit as undisclosed income, leading to a dispute. The CIT(A) partially upheld the addition, prompting the appellant to approach ITAT Pune for relief.
Detailed Analysis: Ravindra Dattu Jadhav, involved in land trading and assisting his parents in running a tea shop, also undertakes agricultural activities on rented land. The...
