Delhi High Court remands BSNL’s GST refund case to Adjudicating Authority, highlighting the importance of proper document submission under CGST Act.
ITAT Hyderabad’s decision exempts Ochre Media Pvt. Ltd. from late filing fees under Section 234E for TDS returns, citing procedural amendments.
Get insights into the West Bengal Settlement of Disputes (SOD) Scheme, 2023. Understand the acts covered and eligibility criteria for dealers and transporters.
Penalty for Non-Appointment CS – matter is returned back to Registrar of Companies advising to re-examine the issues in totality and pass fresh order by taking the above facts into consideration before passing adjudication order and imposing penalty on the Company and its defaulting officers.
Pratap Kumar Pradhan Vs Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha and Ors. (Orissa High Court) The present writ petition is being entertained only because the Second Appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted. Since the petitioner wants to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching 2nd appellate tribunal, which has not yet […]
Show Cause Notice has been issued approximately nine years after last Bill of Entry. In the given facts, we are unable to accept that appellant had issued notice within a reasonable period.
ITO Vs Dipen M. Desai (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is an undisputed fact that the assessee has made payment of Rs.4,98,225/-to the Doctors as their professional fees and the same cannot be termed as referral fees. In fact, the ld AR at the time of argument submitted that the terminology of referral fees was wrongly interpreted […]
Final order passed by AO is beyond limitation period provided u/s 144C of Income Tax Act, hence, same is liable to be declared as null & void
Assessee contended that he was not the owner of the property sold and he executed sale deed on behalf of owner Shri Ashok Kumar Garg and, therefore, fasting tax liability on account of short term or long term capital gain on the shoulders of the assessee is not valid.
Section 148 Income Tax notice issued in the name of company which has already been amalgamated so HC quashed it
