HC held that ITAT was justified in deletion of addition in respect of provision for dam maintenance for five dams being RHEP, Rangali, BHEP, Balimela, UKHPE, Barinut, HPS, Burla and UIHEP, Mukhiguda
Neelam Nitin Sankhe Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) The only reason for making addition of Rs.27.00 lacs in Assessment Year 2013-14 and Rs.5.00 lacs in Assessment Year 2014-15 is that the name of assessee appeared in some document found during the search action in the case of Ameya Group(supra). There is nothing on record to further […]
Treveni Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Others (Punjab and Haryana HC) On asking of the Court, Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocate-Sr. Standing counsel-CBIC, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s) and states that in the absence of production of consignment notes, the impugned order which is an appealable order, has been correctly […]
Commencement of reassessment proceedings while the scrutiny assessment proceedings were on.10.1 Petitioner had taken an objection in that regard, which seems to have escaped the mind of the AO while passing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act.
Swaraj Excellent Manpower Facilities Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the Employee’s Contribution towards Provident Fund has to be deposited before the due date mentioned in the respective statute. In this case it is an admitted position by the assessee in the Audit Report that the amount was not […]
LCL Logistix India Private Limited Vs Union Of India And ANR. (Calcutta High Court) This intra-Court appeal filed by the appellant/writ petitioner is directed against the order dated 19th January, 2017 in WP No.3 of 2017. In the said writ petition, the appellant had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner, Service Tax (ii), Commissionerate, […]
In best judgment assessment Assessing Officer must not act dishonestly or vindictively & honestly & fairly estimate proper assessment figure
Reasons, as recorded for reopening reassessment, are to be examined on a standalone basis to determine validity of section 147 proceedings
ITAT held that acquisition of new house in wife’s name would not jeopardise Section 54 exemption claim of assessee as sale proceeds is utlised for construction of house property
‘e-Way bills’ expired during transit and petitioner was not in a position to ask for its renewal to competent authority when vehicle entered into territory of State of Tripura.
