DCIT Vs Jateen Madanlal Gupta (ITAT Ahmedabad) On perusal of the reasons recorded by the AO, we find that the AO at the threshold has recorded that it is seen that the assessee is having substantial share in ‘JPIL’ which has advanced loan to the companies namely M/S Gujarat Mall Management Pvt. Ltd, and M/S […]
Ashok Vadilal Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The dispute between the assessee and the Revenue is, for the purpose of section 50C, which rate is to be deemed as full consideration for the sale of this property for purpose of section 48 of the Act ? According to the assessee, the rate should be adopted […]
M/S Sdb Diamond Bourse Vs Union Of India (Gujarat High Court) Mr.Vyas is right to a certain extent that the issues raised by the writ applicants before the ARA have been gone into by the Commissioner in the Order in Original. In other words, the Authority, in its order dated 16th July 2020, has adjudicated […]
Piyush Shamjibhai Vasoya Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Indisputably, in the case on hand, no proceedings under Section 62 or Section 63 or Section 64 or Section 67 or Section 73 or Section 74 of the Act have been initiated or pending against the writ applicant. In the absence of pendency of any […]
Lack of declaration in Form No.10 regarding specific purpose for which funds were being accumulated by the assessee trust would not be fatal to the exemption claimed u/s.11(2) of the Act.
In re Deeraj Goyal (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the applicant will be classified under transportation of goods by road, which is exempt or commission agents or goods transport agencies and under what HSN code his services are classified and what will be the turnover? The applicant is engaged in the business of transportation of […]
Himanshu Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax (Punjab & Haryana High Court) In the present case Section 83 order was passed by the Assistant Commissioner. As per the counsel for the respondents the order itself reveals that it was passed with the consent of the Commissioner. However, this would not be […]
On the aspect of delay, genuine hardship would have to be considered before condoning the delay and discretion has to be exercised in genuine cases of hardship and accordingly, exercising his discretion, learned single Judge held that application seeking condonation of delay in filing the returns has to be reconsidered.
he petitioner thereafter made an application seeking rectification of the GSTR-1 Form for the period of January 2018 to March 2018. This application was rejected on the ground that the period for making such an application expired at the end of September 2018 as per Section 37 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
In re Vempati Veerraju (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Question: Whether in the facts and circumstances the contributions to National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) and District Mineral Foundation (DMF) under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR) read with National Mineral Exploration Trust Rules, 2015 (‘NMETR’) and Mines and Minerals (Contribution to District […]
