Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ankur Jain Vs Kunj Lub Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)
Appeal Number : Case No. 50/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ankur Jain Vs Kunj Lub Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)

It has been revealed that the Respondent has not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate from 18% to 12% on the above product w.e.f. 15.11.2017 to 28.02.2018 and hence, the Respondent has violated the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017.

It is further revealed that vide Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2019 specific penalty provisions have been added for violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) which have come in to force w.e.f. 01.01.2020, by inserting Section 171 (3A).

Since no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 15.11.2017 to 31.03.2018 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031