DCIT Vs Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) In the present case, entire expenditure has been incurred at the beginning of the sanctioning of term loan and also qualifies to be revenue expenditure. Therefore, in our considered view the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Taparia Tools Ltd. (supra) is […]
In re Soft turf (GST AAAR Kerala) AAAR held that impugned goads viz. PVC carpet Mat would fall in the Customs Tariff heading 3918 and applicable rate of GST would be 18% (9% each of CGST and SGST). However, this order is restricted to the types of PVC floor coverings/Carpet/Mats being manufactured by the Applicant […]
In re Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) t is seen that the applicant seeks ruling as to whether the services received by them are Pure Services to avail exemption under Sl.No. 3 of Notification No. 12 /2017-C.T.(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The admissibility of the application was examined during the hearing […]
Karan Singh Vs Designated Committee Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme and Another (Delhi High Court ) Since quantification has co-relation and is interlinked with tax relief under the scheme, and the Petitioner has not made a voluntary disclosure, but has rather approached for settlement in respect of case under investigation, we find merit in […]
JCIT Vs Radhe Developers (India) Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) In the case on hand, the assessee has received a sum of Rs. 3.59 crore from Shri Kanjibhai Desai which was treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act by the AO. However, the learned CIT (A) was pleased to delete the addition made […]
Get insights on the modification of bail conditions in Amit Kumar Kataria Vs State of U.P (Gujarat High Court). Court emphasizes reasonable conditions for bail grants.
In re Vasudeva Dall Products Private Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) We have examined the issues raised in the application and the submissions of the applicant as well. In the context of the remarks submitted by the jurisdictional officer, we examine the admissibility of the application without going into the merits of the case. In […]
CBI Vs Prithvi Raj Meena (District Court Delhi) 1. Introduction: Complainant Sh. Krishan Kumar is one of the partners of a firm known as M/s Square 9 Inn. Sh. P.R. Meena/Accused No.1 was the Income Tax Officer (ITO) dealing with the ITR of the said firm. Sh. Deepak Aggarwal/Accused No. 2 is a Chartered Accountant […]
In re Nepra Resource Management Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) As the appellant has not been providing services to the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory or local authority or a Governmental authority or a Government Entity, the benefit of Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not […]
Ram Auto Vs Commissioner of Central Taxes & Central Excise (High Court Madras) In this case The petitioner had filed FORM GST TRAN-1 in time. His only grievance is that he is being denied the benefit of input tax credit for having entered the details in wrong column. The learned counsel for the petitioner drew […]
