Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GST AAR Tamil Nadu)
Appeal Number : Order No. 04/AAR/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GST AAR Tamil Nadu)

t is seen that the applicant seeks ruling as to whether the services received by them are Pure Services to avail exemption under Sl.No. 3 of Notification No. 12 /2017-C.T.(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The admissibility of the application was examined during the hearing extended to them. The applicant stated that they had sought ruling regarding the services received by them for which charges are paid by them, the activity in which they are recipient and not supplier of services. Thus, the question is on the eligibility of a notification in respect of the services received by them and not on the supply made by them.

4.2  Section 95 (a) of CGST and TNGST Act defines ‘advance ruling’ as

(a) “advance ruling” means a decision provided by the Authority or the Appellate

Authority to an applicant on matters or on questions specified in sub-section (2) of section 97 or sub-section (1) of section 100, in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to he undertaken by the applicant;

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031