Case Law Details
In re Bajaj Finance Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Whether the Bounce Charges collected by the Applicant should be treated as a supply under the GST regime?
In the present case, as per details presented before us, we clearly find that there is a clear understanding or agreement between the parties in the present case to foresee and tolerate an act or a situation of default on the part of the client for a monetary consideration which is actually a consideration received by the applicant, though in the agreement they may be giving this consideration, other names such as ‘penal charges’, penalty, Bounce Charges, etc, as thought proper by them, but these different nomenclatures in their Agreement would in no way change the actual nature of monetary “consideration” which would clearly be taxable for the supply of services as per Sr.No. 5(e) of Sch. II of the CGST Act, 2018.
To summarise, the exemption for financial transactions under GST laws is only in respect of the interest/discount earned or paid for loans, deposits or advances. If the transaction, as in the subject case deviates from the above, i.e. the consideration not being an interest or discount, the exemption is not available.
In the subject case the amount of bounce charges cannot be said to be penalty imposed on by the applicant. It is recovered/imposed only because the client has dishonoured the cheques issued by them towards payment of EMI. Dishonour of cheques i.e. a mode of repayment to the applicant by their customers, is an act which results in delay of receipt of repayments to the applicant.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
