Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on imports of ‘Ofloxacin’ originating in or exported from China PR – Whereas, in the matter of import of Ofloxacin (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods) falling under the tariff item 3004 20 34 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act)
Get your pending GST refunds on export of goods sanctioned quickly. CBEC is observing GST refund fortnight across all its field formations from 15th – 28th March, 2018 to deal exclusively with the pending GST refund claims (IGST & ITC.)
E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016 in relation to import and export are reproduced below: Rule 2 Application: These rules shall apply to every manufacturer, producer, consumer, bulk consumer, collection centers, dealers, e-retailer, refurbisher, dismantler and recycler involved in manufacture, sale, transfer, purchase, collection, storage and processing of e-waste or electrical and electronic equipment listed in Schedule I, including their components, consumables, parts and spares which make the product operational but shall not apply to –
S.O. … (E).– In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise & Customs, being satisfied that it is necessary and expedient so to do, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue)
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in super-session of the notification of the Central Board of Excise and Customs No. 18/2018-CUSTOMS (N.T.), dated 1st March, 2018 except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such super session, the Central Board of Excise and Customs
In respect of the Examinations held in November 2017, over 90 cases of infringement/ violation of Instructions to Examinees, which tantamounts to adoption of unfair means, were reported. The nature of infringement/ violation in these cases, inter alia, included the following.
In the absence of any communication on the request made by the petitioner, according to me, the assessing authority should not have completed the assessments, without a further notice to the petitioner.
As we all are aware that under the GST regime, all the major three acts i.e. Central Excise Act, Service Tax Act & VAT Act are merged and the system prevalent under the GST is creating the refunds, almost for every dealer especially for exporters and the dealers those are purchasing the goods as a raw material at higher rates and ultimately manufacture goods are covered under the Lower Tax ability.
Various goods on which the Revenue seeks to collect Excise duty are all, admittedly, products incidentally arising during the manufacture of finished goods on which in any case, the appellant is discharging duty. These scrap material are not emerging due to a process of manufacture. Hence, they do not qualify to be taxed for excise levy.
The amount of Rs. 942 cr were the regular limits sanctioned to Geetanjali Group under consortium lending, and were standard credit exposure at the time of detection of the fraud. Now, this exposure is being added to the existing fraudulent amount. This amount has nothing to do with any new fraudulent LoUs/LoCs.
