These are two appeals by two assessees against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Hyderabad, for the AY. 2009-10. Since common issues are involved in both of these appeals, these are heard together and decided by this common order
These are the appeals filed by the different assessees against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A) Ajmer dated 05/10/2017 for the A.Y. 2013-14 in the matter of order u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short
This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-22, New Delhi, dated 17th April, 2017, for the A.Y. 2009-2010.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 15/06/2012 of learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXXI, New Delhi [in short ‘the CIT-(A)’] for assessment year 2007-08 raising following grounds
Jagdish Narayan Sharma Vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur) A perusal of sections 246 to 251 of the Act makes it clear that any questions arising out of the assessment orders in an appeal by the assessee can be possible and wide powers are given to the appellate authority, but these powers are circumscribed by the assessment […]
Dongfang Electric (India) P Ltd Vs DCWT (ITAT Kolkata) Assets deployed for service activities are treated as productive assets and accordingly the construction / set up of office and service centre by the assessee and used as such for its business purposes would be outside the ambit of wealth tax in the same manner in […]
It is clarified that the Trust of exempted establishment are required to obtain the prior permission of Regional P.F. Commissioner for selling of securities if and only if the Trusts have to utilize the amount obtain4 through sale of securities for meeting the obligatory expenses arising out of any of the reasons mentioned in condition no. 20 itself.
Karnataka hereby constitutes Karnataka Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Services Tax consisting of – 1) The Principal Chief Commissioner, Bengaluru, GST 8v CX Zone, Bengaluru; and 2) The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka), Bengaluru.
All the appeals by the Revenue are directed against different orders of the Ld. CIT(A)- 1, Dehradun, dated 06th February, 2014, for the A.Ys. 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and 2008- 2009.
The assessee is an Individual and engaged in the business of trading in mobile and accessories including SIM card, pre-paid card etc. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO noted that the assessee has shown the payment of commission of Rs. 16,41,989/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act without deduction of TDS
